Poland: health system review 2011
Health Systems in Transition, Vol. 13 No. 8
Overview
Since the successful transition to a freely elected parliament and a market
economy after 1989, Poland is now a stable democracy and is well
represented within political and economic organizations in Europe and
worldwide. The strongly centralized health system based on the Semashko
model was replaced with a decentralized system of mandatory health insurance,
complemented with financing from state and territorial self-government budgets.
There is a clear separation of health care financing and provision: the National
Health Fund (NFZ) – the sole payer in the system – is in charge of health care
financing and contracts with public and non-public health care providers. The
Ministry of Health is the key policy-maker and regulator in the system and is
supported by a number of advisory bodies, some of them recently established.
Health insurance contributions, borne entirely by employees, are collected by
intermediary institutions and are pooled by the NFZ and distributed between
the 16 regional NFZ branches.
In 2009, Poland spent 7.4% of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health.
Around 70% of health expenditure came from public sources and over 83.5%
of this expenditure can be attributed to the (near) universal health insurance.
The relatively high share of private expenditure is mostly represented by out-of-pocket (OOP) payments, mainly in the form of co-payments and informal
payments. Voluntary health insurance (VHI) does not play an important role
and is largely limited to medical subscription packages offered by employers.
Compulsory health insurance covers 98% of the population and guarantees
access to a broad range of health services. However, the limited financial
resources of the NFZ mean that broad entitlements guaranteed on paper are not
always available. Health care financing is overall at most proportional: while
financing from health care contributions is proportional and budgetary subsidies
to system funding are progressive, high OOP expenditures, particularly in areas
such as pharmaceuticals, are highly regressive.
The health status of the Polish population has improved substantially, with
average life expectancy at birth reaching 80.2 years for women and 71.6 years
for men in 2009. However, there is still a vast gap in life expectancy between
Poland and the western European Union (EU) countries and between life
expectancy overall and the expected number of years without illness or
disability. Given its modest financial, human and material health care resources
and the corresponding outcomes, the overall financial efficiency of the Polish
system is satisfactory. Both allocative and technical efficiency leave room
for improvement. Several measures, such as prioritizing primary care and
adopting new payment mechanisms such as diagnosis-related groups (DRGs),
have been introduced in recent years but need to be expanded to other areas
and intensified.
Additionally, numerous initiatives to enhance quality control
and build the required expertise and evidence base for the system are also in
place. These could improve general satisfaction with the system, which is not
particularly high.
Limited resources, a general aversion to cost-sharing stemming from a
long experience with broad public coverage and shortages in health workforce
need to be addressed before better outcomes can be achieved by the system.
Increased cooperation between various bodies within the health and social care
sectors would also contribute in this direction.