Denmark: health system review 2012
Health Systems in Transition, Vol. 14 No. 2

Overview
Denmark has a tradition of a decentralized health system. However,
during recent years, reforms and policy initiatives have gradually
centralized the health system in different ways. The structural
reform of 2007 merged the old counties into fewer bigger regions, and the
old municipalities likewise. The hospital structure is undergoing similar
reforms, with fewer, bigger and more specialized hospitals.
Furthermore, a
more centralized approach to planning and regulation has been taking place
over recent years. This is evident in the new national planning of medical
specialties as well as the establishment of a nationwide accreditation system,
the Danish Healthcare Quality Programme, which sets national standards for
health system providers in Denmark. Efforts have also been made to ensure
coherent patient pathways – at the moment for cancer and heart disease – that
are similar nationwide. These efforts also aim at improving intersectoral
cooperation.
Financially, recent years have seen the introduction of a higher
degree of activity-based financing in the public health sector, combined with
the traditional global budgeting.
A number of challenges remain in the Danish health care system. The
consequences of the recent reforms and centralization initiatives are yet to be
fully evaluated. Before this happens, a full overview of what future reforms
should target is not possible. Denmark continues to lag behind the other Nordic
countries in regards to some health indicators, such as life expectancy. A number
of risk factors may be the cause of this: alcohol intake and obesity continue to be
problems, whereas smoking habits are improving. The level of socioeconomic
inequalities in health also continues to be a challenge.
The organization of
the Danish health care system will have to take a number of challenges into
account in the future. These include changes in disease patterns, with an ageing
population with chronic and long-term diseases; ensuring sufficient staffing;
and deciding how to improve public health initiatives that target prevention of
diseases and favour health improvements.