7.6. Health system efficiency
Germany spends a substantial amount of its wealth on health. Total expenditure on health amounted to 11.7% of GDP in 2018 according to data of the Federal Statistical Office. According to WHO data, per capita health expenditure more than doubled between 2000 and 2018, from USGDP in 2018 according to data of the Federal Statistical Office. According to WHO data, per capita health expenditure more than doubled between 2000 and 2018, from US$ 2687 (adjusted for differences in purchasing power) to US$ 6098, which ranks Germany third in comparison to other WHO Europe countries in 2018 (after Switzerland and Norway) (World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2020) (see section 3.1 Health expenditure). By OECD data, health expenditure in Germany as a share of GDP was the fourth highest share among OECD countries (after the United States, Switzerland and Norway) and per capita spending was way above the OECD36 average of US$ 3994 in 2018 (OECD, 2019).
Per capita expenditure on health in Germany rose by an average of 2.5% per annum in real terms between 2013 and 2018 (up from 2.1% p.a. between 2008 and 2013). In comparison to other OECD countries, this was a relatively large increase during this period, and higher than in the Netherlands (0.5%), France (0.8%), Austria (1.0%), Switzerland (2.1%) and the OECD36 average (2.4%). According to OECD calculations, average per capita health expenditure growth is projected at 1.9% a year between 2015 and 2030, which would reflect a moderate increase compared to other OECD countries (OECD, 2019). The pace of health expenditure growth is partly attributable to the comparatively large human, technical and infrastructural resources in the German health care system and a high level of activity (e.g. in terms of consultations, hospital cases, consumption of pharmaceuticals). In addition, the full implementation of reforms to the LTCI scheme, such as the broadening of eligibility criteria and benefits, and a rapidly ageing population, represents additional pressures on the sustainability of financing (see section 5.8 Long-term care).
One attempt to provide a very cursory illustration of how the health system is performing in terms of input costs and outcomes is to plot current expenditure on health against the amenable mortality rate. Although we must be mindful that it is not possible to effectively disentangle the role of health behaviour and other determinants of the health care system in influencing the level of amenable mortality, Fig7.9 provides a useful entry point for discussion. Germany’s amenable mortality rate has been falling continuously, but it has remained higher than in neighbouring countries throughout the years 2011–2017; at the same time, the country recorded the second highest health expenditure level in 2017, after Switzerland (Fig7.9). The results suggest that the other countries have been able to secure better outcomes on this metric at lower cost (except for Switzerland, whose health expenditure far exceeds that of all the other countries).
Fig7.9
nbsp;2687 (adjusted for differences in purchasing power) to USGDP
in 2018 according to data of the Federal Statistical Office. According
to WHO data, per capita health expenditure more than doubled between
2000 and 2018, from US$ 2687 (adjusted for differences in purchasing
power) to US$ 6098, which ranks Germany third in comparison to other WHO
Europe countries in 2018 (after Switzerland and Norway) (World Health
Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2020) (see section 3.1 Health
expenditure). By OECD data, health expenditure in Germany as a share of GDP was the fourth highest share among OECD countries (after the United States, Switzerland and Norway) and per capita spending was way above the OECD36 average of US$ 3994 in 2018 (OECD, 2019).
Per capita expenditure on health in Germany rose by an average of 2.5% per annum in real terms between 2013 and 2018 (up from 2.1% p.a. between 2008 and 2013). In comparison to other OECD countries, this was a relatively large increase during this period, and higher than in the Netherlands (0.5%), France (0.8%), Austria (1.0%), Switzerland (2.1%) and the OECD36 average (2.4%). According to OECD calculations, average per capita health expenditure growth is projected at 1.9% a year between 2015 and 2030, which would reflect a moderate increase compared to other OECD countries (OECD, 2019). The pace of health expenditure growth is partly attributable to the comparatively large human, technical and infrastructural resources in the German health care system and a high level of activity (e.g. in terms of consultations, hospital cases, consumption of pharmaceuticals). In addition, the full implementation of reforms to the LTCI scheme, such as the broadening of eligibility criteria and benefits, and a rapidly ageing population, represents additional pressures on the sustainability of financing (see section 5.8 Long-term care).
One attempt to provide a very cursory illustration of how the health system is performing in terms of input costs and outcomes is to plot current expenditure on health against the amenable mortality rate. Although we must be mindful that it is not possible to effectively disentangle the role of health behaviour and other determinants of the health care system in influencing the level of amenable mortality, Fig7.9 provides a useful entry point for discussion. Germany’s amenable mortality rate has been falling continuously, but it has remained higher than in neighbouring countries throughout the years 2011–2017; at the same time, the country recorded the second highest health expenditure level in 2017, after Switzerland (Fig7.9). The results suggest that the other countries have been able to secure better outcomes on this metric at lower cost (except for Switzerland, whose health expenditure far exceeds that of all the other countries).
Fig7.9
nbsp;6098,
which ranks Germany third in comparison to other WHO Europe countries
in 2018 (after Switzerland and Norway) (World Health Organization
Regional Office for Europe, 2020) (see section 3.1 Health expenditure).
By OECD data, health expenditure in Germany as a share of GDP was the fourth highest share among OECD countries (after the United States, Switzerland and Norway) and per capita spending was way above the OECD36 average of USGDP
in 2018 according to data of the Federal Statistical Office. According
to WHO data, per capita health expenditure more than doubled between
2000 and 2018, from US$ 2687 (adjusted for differences in purchasing
power) to US$ 6098, which ranks Germany third in comparison to other WHO
Europe countries in 2018 (after Switzerland and Norway) (World Health
Organization Regional Office for Europe, 2020) (see section 3.1 Health
expenditure). By OECD data, health expenditure in Germany as a share of GDP was the fourth highest share among OECD countries (after the United States, Switzerland and Norway) and per capita spending was way above the OECD36 average of US$ 3994 in 2018 (OECD, 2019).
Per capita expenditure on health in Germany rose by an average of 2.5% per annum in real terms between 2013 and 2018 (up from 2.1% p.a. between 2008 and 2013). In comparison to other OECD countries, this was a relatively large increase during this period, and higher than in the Netherlands (0.5%), France (0.8%), Austria (1.0%), Switzerland (2.1%) and the OECD36 average (2.4%). According to OECD calculations, average per capita health expenditure growth is projected at 1.9% a year between 2015 and 2030, which would reflect a moderate increase compared to other OECD countries (OECD, 2019). The pace of health expenditure growth is partly attributable to the comparatively large human, technical and infrastructural resources in the German health care system and a high level of activity (e.g. in terms of consultations, hospital cases, consumption of pharmaceuticals). In addition, the full implementation of reforms to the LTCI scheme, such as the broadening of eligibility criteria and benefits, and a rapidly ageing population, represents additional pressures on the sustainability of financing (see section 5.8 Long-term care).
One attempt to provide a very cursory illustration of how the health system is performing in terms of input costs and outcomes is to plot current expenditure on health against the amenable mortality rate. Although we must be mindful that it is not possible to effectively disentangle the role of health behaviour and other determinants of the health care system in influencing the level of amenable mortality, Fig7.9 provides a useful entry point for discussion. Germany’s amenable mortality rate has been falling continuously, but it has remained higher than in neighbouring countries throughout the years 2011–2017; at the same time, the country recorded the second highest health expenditure level in 2017, after Switzerland (Fig7.9). The results suggest that the other countries have been able to secure better outcomes on this metric at lower cost (except for Switzerland, whose health expenditure far exceeds that of all the other countries).
Fig7.9
nbsp;3994 in 2018 (OECD, 2019).
Per capita expenditure on health in Germany rose by an average of 2.5% per annum in real terms between 2013 and 2018 (up from 2.1% p.a. between 2008 and 2013). In comparison to other OECD countries, this was a relatively large increase during this period, and higher than in the Netherlands (0.5%), France (0.8%), Austria (1.0%), Switzerland (2.1%) and the OECD36 average (2.4%). According to OECD calculations, average per capita health expenditure growth is projected at 1.9% a year between 2015 and 2030, which would reflect a moderate increase compared to other OECD countries (OECD, 2019). The pace of health expenditure growth is partly attributable to the comparatively large human, technical and infrastructural resources in the German health care system and a high level of activity (e.g. in terms of consultations, hospital cases, consumption of pharmaceuticals). In addition, the full implementation of reforms to the LTCI scheme, such as the broadening of eligibility criteria and benefits, and a rapidly ageing population, represents additional pressures on the sustainability of financing (see section 5.8 Long-term care).
One attempt to provide a very cursory illustration of how the health system is performing in terms of input costs and outcomes is to plot current expenditure on health against the amenable mortality rate. Although we must be mindful that it is not possible to effectively disentangle the role of health behaviour and other determinants of the health care system in influencing the level of amenable mortality, Fig7.9 provides a useful entry point for discussion. Germany’s amenable mortality rate has been falling continuously, but it has remained higher than in neighbouring countries throughout the years 2011–2017; at the same time, the country recorded the second highest health expenditure level in 2017, after Switzerland (Fig7.9). The results suggest that the other countries have been able to secure better outcomes on this metric at lower cost (except for Switzerland, whose health expenditure far exceeds that of all the other countries).
Fig7.9